<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Else to Learn at University</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/</link>
	<description>Jeff Staddon on Business and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Acquaintance</title>
		<link>http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Acquaintance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know about &quot;top notch&quot;, although I would probably agree with &quot;decent&quot; or &quot;good&quot;...but then maybe I just had high expectations.  And interestingly enough, my difference of opinion with you on this point is precisely because I did what this post recommends and got most of my knowledge/experience/abilities outside the classroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know about &#8220;top notch&#8221;, although I would probably agree with &#8220;decent&#8221; or &#8220;good&#8221;&#8230;but then maybe I just had high expectations.  And interestingly enough, my difference of opinion with you on this point is precisely because I did what this post recommends and got most of my knowledge/experience/abilities outside the classroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LKM</title>
		<link>http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>LKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;Watch out for teaching languages.&quot;

Most universities teach classes in all kinds of languages. What you call &quot;teaching languages&quot; are simply languages that implement fundamental programming concepts in very clean ways: Eiffel, Pascal, Oberon, Prolog and so on are great for learning concepts. And guess what, you go to Unversity to learn concepts, not programming languages.

If you&#039;ve studied Computer Science and learned to program in Eiffel, learning Java is a two-day job. You already know all the concepts, you&#039;ve just got to become familiar with the syntax and with where to find information about the libraries. Of course, becoming proficient in a language is another matter; proficiency equals knowledge of libraries, and the Java libraries are a huge mess; you&#039;re only going to learn that on a real job, anyway.

If your University has no classes that are thaught in C or Java or C# or C++ or Perl or Ruby (and really, most do at least have classes in C and Java), you can and should learn them on your own. But don&#039;t put too much weight on doing so. If you studied computer science and apply for a job that requires knowledge of a particular language, the employer has no clue and you probably don&#039;t want to work for him anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;Watch out for teaching languages.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most universities teach classes in all kinds of languages. What you call &#8220;teaching languages&#8221; are simply languages that implement fundamental programming concepts in very clean ways: Eiffel, Pascal, Oberon, Prolog and so on are great for learning concepts. And guess what, you go to Unversity to learn concepts, not programming languages.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve studied Computer Science and learned to program in Eiffel, learning Java is a two-day job. You already know all the concepts, you&#8217;ve just got to become familiar with the syntax and with where to find information about the libraries. Of course, becoming proficient in a language is another matter; proficiency equals knowledge of libraries, and the Java libraries are a huge mess; you&#8217;re only going to learn that on a real job, anyway.</p>
<p>If your University has no classes that are thaught in C or Java or C# or C++ or Perl or Ruby (and really, most do at least have classes in C and Java), you can and should learn them on your own. But don&#8217;t put too much weight on doing so. If you studied computer science and apply for a job that requires knowledge of a particular language, the employer has no clue and you probably don&#8217;t want to work for him anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy Jose</title>
		<link>http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 05:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffspost.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/what-else-to-learn-at-university/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Nice post mate. I agree entirely with the &quot;database skills&quot; part. That feeling became yet more enforced after watching the youTube Scalability Google Techtalk. Useful post for someone just graduating from college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post mate. I agree entirely with the &#8220;database skills&#8221; part. That feeling became yet more enforced after watching the youTube Scalability Google Techtalk. Useful post for someone just graduating from college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
